1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 609 F.Supp.3d
  5. 609 F.Supp.3d 1024 (2022)
 

MACCLELLAND v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP

Case No. 21-cv-08592-EMC.

609 F.Supp.3d 1024 (2022)

Teresa MACCLELLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed July 1, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Karl Lukacs, Hattis & Lukacs, Thousand Oaks, CA, Stephen DeNittis, Pro Hac Vice, DeNittis Osefchen Prince, P.C., Marlton, NJ, Che Corrington, Pro Hac Vice, Daniel Morley Hattis, Hattis and Lukacs, Bellevue, WA, for Plaintiffs.

Crystal Nix-Hines, Shon Morgan, Quinn Emanual Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant Cellco Partnership.

Crystal Nix-Hines, Shon Morgan, Marina Lev, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant Verizon Communications Inc.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE TO CUSTOMER AGREEMENT

Docket Nos. 20, 43

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, individually...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases