1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 602 F.Supp.3d
  5. 602 F.Supp.3d 974 (2022)
 

SMITHSON v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO.

SA-21-CV-01225-XR.

602 F.Supp.3d 974 (2022)

Jimmy J. SMITHSON, Plaintiff v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division.

Signed May 11, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony S. Petru, Pro Hac Vice, Gavin S. Barney, Pro Hac Vice, Hildebrand McLeod & Nelson, Oakland, CA, James H. Kaster, Pro Hac Vice, Lucas J. Kaster, Pro Hac Vice, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiff.

Lara Cardin de Leon, Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, San Antonio, TX, Jasmine L. Anderson, Pro Hac Vice, Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Katie M. Rhoten, Robert L. Ortbals, Jr., Pro Hac Vice, Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, St. Louis, MO, for Defendant.

ORDER

On this date, the Court considered Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9), Plaintiff's response (ECF No. 14), and Defendant's reply (ECF No. 17). After careful consideration and holding a hearing on the motion, the Court issues the following order.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases