1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 583 F.Supp.3d
  5. 583 F.Supp.3d 554 (2022)
 

SMITH v. APPLE, INC.

21cv3657 (DLC).

583 F.Supp.3d 554 (2022)

Antoinette SMITH, Fred Santos, and Charles Tucker, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Signed February 2, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For plaintiffs: Spencer Sheegan, Sheegan & Associates, P.C., 60 Cuttermill Road, Ste 409, Great Neck, NY 11021.

For defendant: David John Fioccola, Adam James Hunt, Morrison & Foerster LLP (NYC), 250 West 55th Street, New York, NY 10019.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Antoinette Smith, Fred Santos, and Charles Tucker bring claims on behalf of two putative classes against defendant Apple, Inc. ("Apple") for misleading consumers about the extent of the Apple iPhone's resistance to water exposure. Apple has moved to stay the case, or in the alternative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases