COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
David S. FERRIERO, Defendant,
v.
Alabama, et al., Intervenor-Defendants.
United States District Court, District of Columbia.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Signed March 5, 2021.
Signed March 5, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Jessica Merry Samuels, Martine Elizabeth Cicconi, Michelle S. Kallen, Toby Jay Heytens, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff Commonwealth of Virginia.
Christopher Graham Wells, Kathryn Hunt Muse, Elizabeth Roberson-Young, Illinois Attorney General's Office, Chicago, IL, Michelle S. Kallen, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff State of Illinois.
Heidi Parry Stern, Office of the Attorney General, Las Vegas, NV, Michelle S. Kallen, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Plaintiff State of Nevada.
Liam Holland, Vinita B. Andrapalliyal, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.
Cameron Thomas Norris, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Arlington, VA, Edmund G. LaCour, Jr., Alexander Barrett Bowdre, James William Davis, Kelsey Curtis, State of Alabama Office of Attorney General, Montgomery, AL, Patrick Neilson Strawbridge, Pro Hac Vice, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Boston, MA, for Intervenor-Defendant Alabama.
Cameron Thomas Norris, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Arlington, VA, Elizabeth Baker Murrill, Office of the Attorney General, Baton Rouge, LA, for Intervenor-Defendant Louisiana.
Cameron Thomas Norris, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Arlington, VA, James A. Campbell, Office of the Attorney General, Lincoln, NE, for Intervenor-Defendant Nebraska.
Cameron Thomas Norris, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Arlington, VA, for Intervenor-Defendant South Dakota.
Andree Sophia Blumstein, Attorney General's Office/TN Office of the Solicitor General, Nashville, TN, Cameron Thomas Norris, Consovoy McCarthy PLLC, Arlington, VA, for Intervenor-Defendant Tennessee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge.
GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING INTERVENOR-DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
Hoping to secure a place in the Constitution for sex equality...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
