1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 486 F.Supp.3d
  5. 486 F.Supp.3d 1300 (2020)
 

MINNESOTA RFL REP. FARMER LABOR CAUCUS v. FREEMAN

File No. 19-cv-1949 (ECT/DTS).

486 F.Supp.3d 1300 (2020)

MINNESOTA RFL REPUBLICAN FARMER LABOR CAUCUS, Vincent Beaudette, Vince for Statehouse Committee, Don Evanson, Bonn Clayton, and Michelle MacDonald, Plaintiffs, v. Mike FREEMAN, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Hennepin County, Minnesota, or his successor; Mark Metz, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Carver County, Minnesota, or his successor; Karin Sonneman, in her official capacity as County Attorney for Winona County, Minnesota, or her successor; and James C. Backstrom, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Dakota County, Minnesota, or his successor, Defendants. Attorney General's Office for the State of Minnesota, Intervenor.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

Signed September 14, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erick G. Kaardal and William F. Mohrman, Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs.

Caroline Brunkow, Christiana Martenson, and Kelly K. Pierce, Hennepin County Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendant Mike Freeman.

Abigail Rose Kelzer, Kristin C. Nierengarten, and Scott T. Anderson, Rupp, Anderson, Squires & Waldspurger, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants Mark Metz and Karin Sonneman.

Jeffrey A. Timmerman and William M. Topka, Dakota County Attorney's Office, Hastings, MN, for Defendant James C. Backstrom.

Cicely R. Miltich and Elizabeth C. Kramer, Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN; Amy Slusser Conners and Katherine S. Barrett Wiik, Best & Flanagan, Minneapolis, MN, for Intervenor Attorney General's Office for the State of Minnesota.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs, who describe themselves as "political candidates, political associations, and individuals who engage in political activities relating to political elections and campaigns in Minnesota," Compl. ¶ 17 [ECF No. 1], brought this case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases