1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GIUFFRE v. MAXWELL
 

GIUFFRE v. MAXWELL

No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP).

VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 19, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332ct
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332ct Diversity - (Citizenship)
Nature of Suit: 320 Assault Libel & Slander
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley James Edwards , Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing. Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., pro hac vice, John Pottinger , J. Stanley Pottinger PLLC, Meredith L. Schultz , Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Paul G. Cassell , S.J. Quinney College of Law At The University of Utah & Sigrid S. McCawley , Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP.

Sharon Churcher, Respondent, represented by Eric Joel Feder , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP & Laura R. Handman , Davis, Wright, Tremaine, LLP.

Jeffrey Epstein, Respondent, represented by Jack Alan Goldberger , Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., pro hac vice, Martin Gary Weinberg , Martin G. Weinberg, PC & Michael Campion Miller , Steptoe & Johnson, LLP.

Nadia Marcinko, Miscellaneous, represented by Erica Tamar Dubno , Fahringer & Dubno.

Sarah Vickers, Interested Party, represented by Alexander Seton Lorenzo , Alston & Bird, LLP & John E. Stephenson, Jr. , Alston & Bird LLP.

Sarah Ransome, Material Witness, represented by Paul G. Cassell , S.J. Quinney College of Law At The University of Utah & John Pottinger , J. Stanley Pottinger PLLC.

Alan M. Dershowitz, Intervenor, represented by Andrew G. Celli , Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP & David A. Lebowitz , Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP.

Michael Cernovich d/b/a Cernovich Media, Intervenor, represented by Jay Marshall Wolman , Randazza Legal Group PLLC.

Julie Brown & Miami Herald Media Company, Intervenors, represented by Christine Walz , Holland & Knight, Sanford Lewis Bohrer , Holland & Knight LLP & Madelaine Jane Woolfrey Harrington , Holland & Knight LLP.

ORDER

The Court has considered the parties' various submissions regarding the review protocol ("the Protocol") to be utilized by the Court in its individualized review of the sealed materials at issue in this litigation. (See dkt. nos. 1025, 1026, 1028...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases