1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BINKLEY v. SHINN
 

BINKLEY v. SHINN

No. CV-18-08243-PCT-MTL.

Bradley Corwin Binkley, Petitioner, v. David Shinn, et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

March 18, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nature of Suit: 530 Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley Corwin Binkley, Petitioner, pro se.

Attorney General of the State of Arizona & David Shinn, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondents, represented by Andrew Stuart Reilly, Office of the Attorney General.

ORDER

Before the Court is Bradley Binkley's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 1.) The Court has reviewed the Petition, Response to the Petition (Doc. 9), Reply to the Response (Doc. 10), Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 13), Objection to the R&R (Doc. 21), and Response to the Objection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases