UNIVERSAL ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION v. ARUZE GAMING AMERICA, INC.

Case No. 2:18-cv-00585-RFB-NJK.

Universal Entertainment Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Aruze Gaming America, Inc. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

March 16, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Universal Entertainment Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by David S. Krakoff , Buckley LLP, pro hac vice, Gregory Vincent Novak , Polsinelli PC, pro hac vice, Henry A. Petri, Jr. , Polsinelli PC, pro hac vice, Jay Joseph Schuttert , Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP, Michael D. Pegues , Polsinelli PC, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , Polsinelli LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew Weaver , Polsinelli PC, pro hac vice & David W. Gutke , Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP.

Aruze Gaming America, Inc., Defendant, represented by Bryce K. Kunimoto , Holland & Hart, J. Stephen Peek , Holland & Hart, LLP, Kristin L. Cleveland , Klarquist Sparkman LLP, pro hac vice, Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP, Sarah Jelsema , Klarquist Sparkman LLP, pro hac vice & Jeffrey S. Love , Klarquist Sparkman LLP, pro hac vice.

Kazuo Okada, Defendant, represented by Bryce K. Kunimoto , Holland & Hart, J. Stephen Peek , Holland & Hart, LLP & Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP.

Kazuo Okada, Counter Claimant, represented by J. Stephen Peek , Holland & Hart, LLP, Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP & Bryce K. Kunimoto , Holland & Hart.

Aruze Gaming America, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Bryce K. Kunimoto , Holland & Hart, J. Stephen Peek , Holland & Hart, LLP, Kristin L. Cleveland , Klarquist Sparkman LLP, Robert J. Cassity , Holland & Hart LLP, Sarah Jelsema , Klarquist Sparkman LLP, pro hac vice & Jeffrey S. Love , Klarquist Sparkman LLP, pro hac vice.

Jun Fujimoto, Counter Defendant, represented by Jay Joseph Schuttert , Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP & David W. Gutke , Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP.

Universal Entertainment Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by David S. Krakoff , Buckley LLP, pro hac vice, Gregory Vincent Novak , Polsinelli PC, pro hac vice, Henry A. Petri, Jr. , Polsinelli PC, pro hac vice, Michael D. Pegues , Polsinelli PC, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , Polsinelli LLP, pro hac vice, David W. Gutke , Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP & Jay Joseph Schuttert , Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP.


ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court are Defendants Aruze Gaming America, Inc. ("AGA") and Kazuo Okada's Motions for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 119) and Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 120). The motions are denied.

II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Universal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases