1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HOFFERTH v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 

HOFFERTH v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Civil Action No. 3:17-01560-MGL.

THOMAS JOSHUA HOFFERTH, Plaintiff, v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN, L.P., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

March 5, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Product Liability
Nature of Suit: 367 Personal Injury: Health Care / Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Joshua Hofferth, an individual, Plaintiff, represented by Eugene Hood Temple , Hyman Law Firm, William P. Hatfield , Hyman Law Firm, Lauren Aliz Welling , Sanders Phillips Grossman, LLC, pro hac vice, Timothy Michael Clark , Sanders Phillips Grossman, LLC, pro hac vice & Timothy Wade Porter , Porter and Malouf PA, pro hac vice.

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson & Janssen Research and Development, LLC, Defendants, represented by Amanda S. Kitts , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough, David Eidson Dukes , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough, Dell P. Chappell , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough, Rachel Atkin Hedley , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough, Gregg W. Mackuse , Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath LLP, pro hac vice, Heather C. Giordanella , Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath LLP, pro hac vice, John J. Powers , Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath LLP, pro hac vice, Molly E. Flynn , Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath LLP, pro hac vice & William Victor Essig , Faegre Drinker Biddle and Reath LLP, pro hac vice.

Janssen, L.P., Defendant, represented by Amanda S. Kitts , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough, David Eidson Dukes , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough & Dell P. Chappell , Nelson Mullins Riley and Scarborough.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND DEEMING MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an action for various tort-based claims under South Carolina law. The Court has jurisdiction over this matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases