1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. FLUOR CORPORATION
 

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. FLUOR CORPORATION

No. 4:16CV00429 ERW.

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FLUOR CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

March 4, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Declaratory Judgment
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Zurich American Insurance Company, Plaintiff, represented by Harnaik Kahlon , RILEY SAFER LLP, Joseph Michael Morris , ROBERTS PERRYMAN, P.C., Lisa A. Pake , HAAR AND WOODS, LLP, Robert T. Haar , HAAR AND WOODS, LLP, Timothy J. Wolf , BROWN AND JAMES, P.C., Alison Grounds , TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP, pro hac vice, David Russell McCourt , BROWN AND JAMES, P.C., Jaymeson Pegue , PEGUE AND THOMPSON, pro hac vice, Philip H. Thompson , HUNT ORTMANN, pro hac vice & Ronald S. Safer , RILEY SAFER LLP.

Fluor Corporation, Defendant, represented by Brook B. Roberts , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, Drew T. Gardiner , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, pro hac vice, John T. Ryan , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, pro hac vice, John Michael Wilson , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, Randal K. Mullendore , HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP, Christine F. Miller , HUSCH BLACKWELL, LLP, Grant E. Strother , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, John D. Niemeyer , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, Melanie J. Grindle , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, Steven Bauer , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP & Steven B. Lesan , LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP.

The Doe Run Resources Corporation, Andrew Rothschild & Edward Dowd, witnesss, represented by Kevin M. Cushing , CARMODY MACDONALD P.C.

Zurich American Insurance Company, Counter Defendant, represented by Harnaik Kahlon , RILEY SAFER LLP, Timothy J. Wolf , BROWN AND JAMES, P.C. & Joseph Michael Morris , ROBERTS PERRYMAN, P.C.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Counterclaimant Fluor's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaims [341]. The Motion is fully briefed. For the reasons that follow, Fluor's Motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases