BRADT v. T-MOBILE US, INC.

Case No. 19-cv-07752-BLF.

KEITH DEAN BRADT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. T-MOBILE US, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

February 28, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Nature of Suit: 410 Anti - Trust
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith Dean Bradt, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph M. Alioto, Sr. , Alioto Law Firm, Anthony Lawrence Label , The Veen Firm, P.C., Christopher A. Nedeau , Nedeau Law Firm, Jamie Lynne Miller , Alioto Law Firm, Josephine Leticia Alioto , The Veen Firm, P.C. & Lawrence Genaro Papale , Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale.

Tim Nieboer, Pam Ward, Valerie Jolly, June Stansbury, Katherine Arcell, Christine Whalen, Jose Brito, Brenda Davis, Pam Faust, Carolyn Fjord, Gabe Garavanian, Harry Garavanian, Jocelyn Gardner, Mike Malaney, Len Marazzo, Lisa McCarthy, Deborah Pulfer, William Rubinsohn, Sondra Russell, Clyde Stensrud, Gary Talewsky, Diane Ultican & Jeffrey Nickerson, Plaintiffs, represented by Joseph M. Alioto, Sr. , Alioto Law Firm, Anthony Lawrence Label , The Veen Firm, P.C., Christopher A. Nedeau , Nedeau Law Firm, Josephine Leticia Alioto , The Veen Firm, P.C. & Lawrence Genaro Papale , Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale.

T-Mobile US, Inc. & Deutsche Telekom AG, Defendants, represented by David I. Gelfand , Cleary Gottlieb Steen and Hamilton LLP, pro hac vice, George Stephen Cary , Cleary Gottlieb Steen and Hamilton LLP & Jeremy James Calsyn , Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.

Sprint Corporation, Defendant, represented by Bonnie Lau , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Steven C. Sunshine , Skadden Arps Slate Meagher and Flom LLP, pro hac vice, Allen Ruby , Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, LLP, Bradley Stuart Lui , Morrison and Foerster, David L. Meyer , Morrison Foerster LLP, pro hac vice, Julia K. York , Skadden Arps Slate Meagher and Flom LLP, pro hac vice & Karen Hoffman Lent , Skadden Arps Slate Meagher Flom LLP, pro hac vice.

SoftBank Group Corp., Defendant, represented by Bonnie Lau , Morrison & Foerster LLP, Bradley Stuart Lui , Morrison and Foerster & David L. Meyer , Morrison Foerster LLP, pro hac vice.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE; DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN ORDER EXPEDITING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE, SETTING A HEARING ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND FOR LIMITED, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

[ECF 5, 35]

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases