CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC. v. CARDIO FLOW, INC.

Case No. 0:18-cv-1253-SRN-KMM.

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Cardio Flow, Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

February 27, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Lewis Allender , Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Roman Maximillia Silberfeld , Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi LLP, pro hac vice & Thomas F. Berndt , Robins Kaplan LLP.

Cardio Flow, Inc., Defendant, represented by Daniel R. Hall , Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA, Joseph W. Anthony , Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie PA & Joseph Robert Richie , Anthony Ostlund Baer & Louwagie P.A..


ORDER

This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. ("CSI")'s Motion to Amend the Complaint. (ECF No. 95.) Defendant Cardio Flow, Inc. ("Cardio Flow") opposes the Motion. After careful consideration, the Court determines that CSI's Motion should be DENIED.

I. Factual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases