1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 441 F.Supp.3d
  5. 441 F.Supp.3d 817 (2020)
 

ARIZONA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE v. DUCEY

No. CV-17-01422-PHX-SPL.

441 F.Supp.3d 817 (2020)

ARIZONA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUCEY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

Signed February 27, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 950 Other Statutes: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew McNulty, Pro Hac Vice, David A. Lane, Pro Hac Vice, Killmer Lane & Newman LLP, Denver, CO, Dan W. Goldfine, Ian Matthew Fischer, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP-Phoenix Office, Kathleen E. Brody, Mitchell Stein Carey Chapman PC, Jared G. Keenan, Martin Lieberman, ACLU, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs.

Eryn Marie McCarthy, Nancy M. Bonnell, Office of the Attorney General, Carrie Ann Laliberte, Lisa Tewksbury Hauser, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint PC, Phoenix, AZ for Defendant.

ORDER

On May 8, 2017, Plaintiffs, individual criminal-defense lawyers, investigators, and non-profit organization Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice, initiated this action (the "Original Complaint") challenging the constitutionality of Ariz. Rev. Stat. ("A.R.S.") § 13-4433...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases