1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SCHUMAN v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED
 

SCHUMAN v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED

Case No. 16-cv-05544-HSG.

PETER SCHUMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 24, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Schuman & William Coplin, Plaintiffs, represented by Cliff Michael Palefsky , McGuinn Hillsman & Palefsky, Michael Rubin , Altshuler Berzon LLP, Andrew Edward Kushner , Altshuler Berzon LLP, William Bernard Reilly , Law Office of William Reilly & Keith A. Ehrman , McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky.

Microchip Technology Incorporated, Atmel Corporation & Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program, Defendants, represented by Mark E. Schmidtke , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, Stewart, P.C., pro hac vice, Elizabeth M. Soveranez , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Erika L. Leonard , Ogletree Deakins Law Firm, pro hac vice, Kristina Holmstrom , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, Stewart, P.C., pro hac vice, Mark Gerard Kisicki , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart P.C. & Sean Patrick Nalty , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

Microchip Technology Incorporated & Atmel Corporation, Counter-claimants, represented by Mark E. Schmidtke , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, Stewart, P.C., Elizabeth M. Soveranez , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Mark Gerard Kisicki , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart P.C. & Sean Patrick Nalty , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

William Coplin & Peter Schuman, Counter-defendants, represented by Cliff Michael Palefsky , McGuinn Hillsman & Palefsky, Michael Rubin , Altshuler Berzon LLP, William Bernard Reilly , Law Office of William Reilly & Keith A. Ehrman , McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky.

ORDER GRANTING CLASS CERTIFICATION

Re: Dkt. No. 107

Pending before the Court is the motion for class certification filed by Plaintiffs Peter Schuman and William Coplin. See Dkt. No. 107. The Court held a hearing on June 27, 2019. See Dkt. No. 113. For the reasons detailed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases