1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CS TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HORIZON RIVER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
 

CS TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HORIZON RIVER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

No. 3:18-cv-00273-RJC-DSC.

CS TECHNOLOGY, INC. and SITEHANDS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. HORIZON RIVER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

February 21, 2020.

Editors Note
Cause: Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CS Technology, Inc. & Sitehands, Inc., Plaintiffs, represented by Alyssa C. Scruggs , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., pro hac vice, Amanda L. Clairmont , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., pro hac vice, Keith P. Carroll , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., pro hac vice, Mathilda Sage McGee-Tubb , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovksy and Popeo PC, pro hac vice, Amelia Larrick Serrat , Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan LLP & Clifton L. Brinson , Smith, Anderson, Blount.

Horizon River Technologies, LLC, Defendant, represented by James Carlos Smith , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, Jason S. McCarter , Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, John E. Sharpe, III , Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, pro hac vice & Lee A. Peifer , Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, pro hac vice.

Horizon River Technologies, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by James Carlos Smith , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, Jason S. McCarter , Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, John E. Sharpe, III , Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, pro hac vice & Lee A. Peifer , Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, pro hac vice.

CS Technology, Inc. & Sitehands, Inc., Counter Defendants, represented by Alyssa C. Scruggs , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., pro hac vice, Amanda L. Clairmont , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., pro hac vice, Keith P. Carroll , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., pro hac vice, Mathilda Sage McGee-Tubb , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovksy and Popeo PC, pro hac vice, Amelia Larrick Serrat , Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan LLP, Clifton L. Brinson , Smith, Anderson, Blount, Alyssa C. Scruggs , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Keith P. Carroll , Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., Mathilda Sage McGee-Tubb , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovksy and Popeo PC & Amanda L. Clairmont , Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C..

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' partial motion to dismiss Defendant's Second Amended and Supplemental Counterclaim, (Doc. No. 102), and the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"), (Doc. No. 132).

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases