OMNI MedSCI, INC. v. APPLE INC.

Case No. 19-cv-05924-YGR.

OMNI MEDSCI, INC., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. APPLE INC, Defendant/Counter Claimant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division.

February 14, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Omni MedSci, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Thomas Arthur Lewry , Brooks & Kushman PC, Alan Joseph Gocha , Brooks Kushman P.C., Christopher Charles Smith , Brooks Kushman P.C., John M. Halan , Brooks Kushman P.C., John S. Le Roy , Brooks & Kushman PC, John Stephen LeRoy , Brooks Kushman P.C., Robert C.J. Tuttle , Brooks & Kushman PC & William E. Thomson, Jr. , Brooks Kushman P.C.

Apple Inc, Defendant, represented by Brooke S. Zarouri , Sidley & Austin, Ching-Lee Fukuda , Sidley Austin LLP, Hamilton Cooper Simpson , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Irene Inkyu Yang , Sidley Austin LLP, Jeffrey Paul Kushan , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Jeffrey Paul Kushan , Sidley Austin LLP, Sharon Lee , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Thomas Anthony Broughan, III , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice & Vernon Michael Winters , Sidley Austin LLP.

Apple Inc, Counter-claimant, represented by Brooke S. Zarouri , Sidley & Austin, Ching-Lee Fukuda , Sidley Austin LLP, Hamilton Cooper Simpson , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Irene Inkyu Yang , Sidley Austin LLP, Jeffrey Paul Kushan , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Sharon Lee , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Thomas Anthony Broughan, III , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice & Vernon Michael Winters , Sidley Austin LLP.

Omni MedSci, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Thomas Arthur Lewry , Brooks & Kushman PC, Alan Joseph Gocha , Brooks Kushman P.C., Christopher Charles Smith , Brooks Kushman P.C., John M. Halan , Brooks Kushman P.C., John S. Le Roy , Brooks & Kushman PC, John Stephen LeRoy , Brooks Kushman P.C., Robert C.J. Tuttle , Brooks & Kushman PC & William E. Thomson, Jr. , Brooks Kushman P.C..


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ORDER CERTIFYING THE STANDING QUESTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1292(B) AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

Now before the Court is Defendant and Counter-Claimant Apple Inc.'s ("Apple") unopposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases