1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. COHEN v. APPLE INC.
 

COHEN v. APPLE INC.

No. C 19-05322 WHA.

ANDREW COHEN, TIMOTHY HORNICK, KALEAH C. ALLEN, NICHOLAS CARLSON, GLENN E. JACOBS, MARK WEILER, CHAD SMITH, SARAH D. SMITH, MATT KOPPIN, SCOTT CISCHKE, KRYSTLE FAERN, RODOLFO CABRERA, BRANDY DAVIS, WILLIAM ZIDE, ZACHARY GOMOLEKOFF, DAVID HEDICKER, NANCY MAEKAWA, CATHERINE GOODWIN, PAUL COLETTI, KATHLEEN BOGGS, KIMBERLY MODESITT, KIMBERLY BENJAMIN, MARK KUNZE, ARIANA RYAN, NATHAN COOPER, BECKY WELLINGTON, M. GAIL SUNDELL, VICTOR PERLMAN, and JUNE A. HALL, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 10, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Fraud
Nature of Suit: 370 Other Fraud
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Cohen, Kaleah C Allen, Kimberly Benjamin, Timothy Hornick, Nicholas Carlson, Mark Weiler, Chad Smith, Sarah D Smith, Scott Cischke, Matt Koppin & Albert Collins, Plaintiffs, represented by Elizabeth A. Fegan , Fegan Scott LLC, pro hac vice, Jennie Lee Anderson , Andrus Anderson LLP, Audrey Claire Siegel , Andrus Anderson LLP, Jessica H. Meeder , Fegan Scott LLC & Lynn Ellenberger , Fegan Scott LLC, pro hac vice.

Rodolfo Cabrera, Zachary Gomolekoff, Becky Wellington, William Zide, Kathleen Boggs, Glenn Jacobs, Krystle Faeryn, Nathan Cooper, Nancy Maekawa, Ariana Ryan, M. Gail Sundell, Catherine Goodwin, Paul Coletti, June A Hall, David Hedicker, Kimberly Modesitt, Victor Perlman, Mark Kunze & Brandy Davis, Plaintiffs, represented by Audrey Claire Siegel , Andrus Anderson LLP, Lynn Ellenberger , Fegan Scott LLC, pro hac vice & Elizabeth A. Fegan , Fegan Scott LLC.

Apple Inc., Defendant, represented by Jonathan S. Tam , Dechert, LLP, Amisha Rajni Patel , Dechert LLP, pro hac vice, Christina Guerola Sarchio , Dechert LLP, pro hac vice & Mark S. Cheffo , Dechert LLP, pro hac vice.

ORDER CONVERTING MOTION TO DISMISS INTO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ALLOWING IMMEDIATE DISCOVERY

In this putative class action for negligence, breach of warranty, consumer fraud, and unjust enrichment, defendant moves to dismiss the complaint. For the following reasons, this order converts the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases