I.P. a minor child by his grandfather and Next Friend DONALD G. NEWSOME, MICHAEL PRICE and CHANDLER PRICE, Plaintiffs,
v.
WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF LARRY M. PIERCE, in his official capacity; SERGEANT SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER BRANDY JONES, in her individual capacity; SERGEANT SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER SHATANA LATICE JONES, in her individual capacity; LIEUTENANT SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER WILLIAM KATES in his individual capacity; SERGEANT SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER MARION WALTON in his individual capacity; WESTERN SURETY COMPANY; MARK ARMSTRONG, individually and as employee for BUTTERFLY EFFECTS, LLC; BRITTNE BROOKS, individually and as employee for BUTTERFLY EFFECTS, LLC, BUTTERFLY EFFECTS, LLC, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2, Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 30, 2020.
January 30, 2020.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael Price, Chandler Price & I. P., a minor child, by his grandfather and Next Friend, Donald G. Newsome, Plaintiffs, represented by Dawn T. Mistretta , Strauch Green & Mistretta, P.C. & Stanley B. Green , Strauch Green & Mistretta, P.C.
Sergeant Brandy Jones, in her individual capacity, Sergeant Shatana Latice Jones, in her individual capacity, Lieutenant William Kates, in his individual capacity & Sergeant Marion Walton, in his individual capacity, Defendants, represented by Devlin K. Horton , Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP & Jeffrey H. Blackwell , Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP.
Mark Armstrong, individually and as an employee for Butterfly Effects, LLC, Brittne Brooks, individually and as an employee for Butterfly Effects, LLC & Butterfly Effects, LLC, Defendants, represented by Joshua M. Hiller , Huff Powell & Bailey, PLLC & Pankaj K. Shere , Huff Powell & Bailey, PLLC.
ORDER
RICHARD E. MYERS, II, District Judge.
In light of this Court's order of January 30, 2020 at [DE-62], and the filing of the Second Amended Complaint at [DE-63], the defendant Larry M. Pierce's Motion to Dismiss [DE-46] is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
