1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CADDICK v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY
 

CADDICK v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY

Case No. 2:19-cv-02106-JDW.

WILLIAM CADDICK and STEPHEN HOPKINS, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

January 24, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

WILLIAM CADDICK & STEPHEN HOPKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS, Plaintiffs, represented by CHARLES J. KOCHER , SALTZ MONGELUZZI BARRETT & BENDESKY PC.

TASTY BAKING COMPANY, Defendant, represented by K. CLARK WHITNEY , OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART PC, DEAN J. SHAUGER , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., JESSICA BOCCHINFUSO , OGLETREE DEAKINS, JOSHUA BRAND , Ogletree Deakins & KEVIN P. HISHTA , OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART PC.

MEMORANDUM

William Caddick and Stephen W. Hopkins assert claims against Tasty Banking Company for unpaid overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and for improper pay deductions under the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law ("WPCL"), alleging that Tasty classified them as independent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases