1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CONTI v. DOE
 

CONTI v. DOE

No. 17-CV-9268 (VEC).

PAUL M. CONTI, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 24, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dr. Paul M. Conti, Plaintiff, represented by George William Allison Bartholomew , Judd Burstein, P.C., Peter B. Schalk , Judd Burstein, P.C. & Judd Burstein , Judd Burstein, P.C.

John Doe, Interested Party, represented by Douglas Edward Lieb , Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP, Katherine R. Rosenfeld , Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP & Andrew G. Celli , Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP.

Jane Doe & James Doe, Interested Partys, represented by Steven W. Tigges , Zeiger, Tigges & Little LLP & Ariel Brough , Zeiger, Tigges & Little.

Dr. Paul M. Conti, Counter Defendant, represented by George William Allison Bartholomew , Judd Burstein, P.C., Peter B. Schalk , Judd Burstein, P.C. & Judd Burstein , Judd Burstein, P.C..

ORDER

WHEREAS on January 24, 2020, the parties appeared for a conference with this Court;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The parties' Daubert motions must be filed no later than March 20, 2020. Responses are due by April 17, 2020. Replies are due by May 1, 2020...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases