1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. VICIDIEM, INC. v. CHRISTENSEN
 

VICIDIEM, INC. v. CHRISTENSEN

Case No. 2:19-cv-00358-DB.

VICIDIEM, INC., a Utah corporation, and CRAIG HUTCHINSON, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. PAUL CHRISTENSEN, an individual, and FIBERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company; DEAN NORTH, an individual; STEVEN TWEEDIE, an individual; JOHN DOES I — X, and DOE CORPORATIONS I — X. Defendants. PAUL CHRISTENSEN, an individual, Counterclaimant, VICIDIEM, INC., a Utah corporation; CRAIG HUTCHINSON, an individual, Counterclaim Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Utah.

December 23, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1836(b)
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1836(b) - Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vicidiem, a Utah corporation & Craig Hutchinson, an individual, Plaintiffs, represented by Blake D. Miller , ANDERSON & KARRENBERG, Jacob Dale Barney , ANDERSON & KARRENBERG & Jared D. Scott , ANDERSON & KARRENBERG.

Paul Christensen, an individual & Fiberwave Technologies, a Utah limited liability company, Defendants, represented by Kent R. Christensen , CALL & JENSEN, pro hac vice & Roger P. Christensen , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

Dean North, an individual & Steven Tweedie, an individual, Defendants, represented by Kent R. Christensen , CALL & JENSEN & Roger P. Christensen , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

Paul Christensen, an individual & Dean North, an individual, Counter Claimants, represented by Kent R. Christensen , CALL & JENSEN & Roger P. Christensen , CHRISTENSEN & JENSEN PC.

Craig Hutchinson, an individual & Vicidiem, a Utah corporation, Counter Defendants, represented by Blake D. Miller , ANDERSON & KARRENBERG, Jacob Dale Barney , ANDERSON & KARRENBERG & Jared D. Scott , ANDERSON & KARRENBERG.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. (Dkt. No. 25.) The court denied the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order on October 31, 2019. (Dkt. No. 35.) The court then held a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases