1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GABRIEL v. EL PASO COMBINED COURTS
 

GABRIEL v. EL PASO COMBINED COURTS

Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02248-DDD-KMT.

VINCENT GABRIEL, Plaintiff, v. EL PASO COMBINED COURTS, DAVID LEE SHAKES, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of El Paso Combined Courts, GWEN PRATOR, individually and as employee of David Shakes, DANIEL MAY, individually and in his official capacity as District Attorney, DAVID GUEST, individually and as an employee, JOHN PARCELL, as an employee, BECCA KINIKIN, as an employee, and ADAM BAILEY, individually and as an employee, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

December 17, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent Gabriel, Plaintiff, pro se.

El Paso Combined Courts, David (I) Lee Shakes, Individually, David Lee Shakes, In his official capacity as Judge of El Paso Combined Courts, Gwen (I) Prator, Individually & Gwen Prator, as employee of, Defendants, represented by Andrew Mutabaazi Katarikawe , Colorado Attorney General's Office.

Daniel (I) H. May, Individually, David (I) Guest, Individually, John (I) Parcell, Individually, Becca (I) Kinikin, Individually & Adam (I) Bailey, Individually, Defendants, represented by Mary Margaret Ritchie , El Paso County Attorney's Office.

Daniel H. May, As District Attorney, David Guest, As employee, John Parcell, As employee, Becca Kinikin, As employee & Adam Bailey, As employee, Defendants, represented by Bryan E. Schmid , El Paso County Attorney's Office & Mary Margaret Ritchie , El Paso County Attorney's Office.

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Plaintiff Vincent Gabriel, proceeding pro se, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages for alleged violations of his First, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, as well as under several state-law tort theories. Before the Court are motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases