1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HUNTER v. RHINO SHIELD
 

HUNTER v. RHINO SHIELD

Case No. 2:18-cv-01097.

RUTH A. HUNTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RHINO SHIELD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

November 20, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Contract Default
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Dodds Curphey, Mediator, pro se.

Ruth A Hunter & Mark D Hunter, Executor of Estate of David G. Hunter, Deceased, Plaintiffs, represented by James Patrick Connors , Law Offices of James P Connors.

Rhino Shield, James H Williams, Steven C Dominique, Tri-State Coating Inc., AmCoat Industries Inc., Rudolph J Pallone, AmCoat Technologies Incorporated & Rhino Shield Florida, Defendants, represented by Zachary Swisher , Sybert, Rhoad, Lackey & Swisher, LLC & David L. Lackey , Sybert, Rhoad, Lackey & Swisher, LLC.

Aleksandre Dgebuadze, Defendant, pro se.

ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the failure of Defendant Dgebuadze to file a response to the Court's Order from October 31, 2019, directing him to Show Cause as to why the Clerk should not enter default...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases