1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 417 F.Supp.3d
  5. 417 F.Supp.3d 1233 (2019)
 

WILLIAMS v. EAZE SOLUTIONS, INC.

Case No. 3:18-cv-02598-JD.

417 F.Supp.3d 1233 (2019)

Farrah WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. EAZE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed October 21, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David William Hall, San Francisco, CA, Frank S Hedin, Hedin Hall LLP, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff.

Fiona Tang, Oakland, CA, Albert Quoc Giang, Michael Dietz Roth, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER RE ARBITRATION

In this putative class action, plaintiff Farrah Williams alleges that defendant Eaze Solutions violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA"), 47 U.S.C. § 227, by sending her unsolicited, autodialed text messages. Eaze seeks to compel arbitration of her claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases