1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. POUNCY v. PALMER
 

POUNCY v. PALMER

Case No. 13-cv-14695.

OMAR RASHAD POUNCY, Petitioner, v. CARMEN D. PALMER, Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 17, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Omar Rashad Pouncy, Petitioner, represented by John J. Bursch , Bursch Law PLLC, Aaron M. Katz , Ropes & Gray LLP, Brian P. Lennon , Warner Norcross & Judd LLP, Daniel Meron , Latham and Watkins LLP, Nayha Arora , Latham and Watkins LLP, Stephen N. Shashy , Latham and Watkins LLP & David L. Moffitt , Law Offices of David L. Moffitt & Associates.

Carmen D. Palmer, Respondent, represented by David Andrew Porter , State of Michigan Department of Attorney General & John S. Pallas , Michigan Department of Attorney General.

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING INTERFERENCE WITH ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION (ECF No. 231)

On May 3, 2019, Petitioner Omar Pouncy filed a renewed Motion for Respondent to Show Cause Regarding Interference with Attorney-Client...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases