1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JOHNSTON v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
 

JOHNSTON v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 16-cv-03134-EMC.

TODD JOHNSTON, Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

September 16, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd Johnston, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, represented by Thomas J. Brandi , The Brandi Law Firm, Brian J. Malloy , The Brandi Law Firm, John Randolph Davis , Slack Davis Sanger, LLP & Michael L. Slack , Slack Davis Sanger LLP.

Uber Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant, represented by Andrew Michael Spurchise , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Carlos Jimenez , Littler Mendelson, P.C., Keith Adam Jacoby , Littler Mendelson & Sophia Behnia , Littler Mendelson, P.C..

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATION

Docket No. 110.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Todd Johnston ("Plaintiff") filed a class action lawsuit against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant"). Mr. Johnston asserts one cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases