1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. EWING v. PHAIR
 

EWING v. PHAIR

Case No. 19cv1670-LAB (MSB).

ANTON EWING, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH PHAIR, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

September 9, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC - Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anton Ewing, an individual, Plaintiff, pro se.

Joseph Phair, an individual, Defendant, represented by Christopher Reichman , Prato & Reichman, APC.

ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT

Plaintiff filed a complaint bringing claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. But the complaint includes various warnings and admonitions to Defendant Joseph Phair's attorney. (Compl., ¶¶ 4-10.) Neither Phair nor his counsel has made an appearance.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases