1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BURGESS v. HOEM
 

BURGESS v. HOEM

No. 18-cv-527-jdp.

EDWARD B. BURGESS, Plaintiff, v. STACY HOEM and DR. MINK, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

September 4, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Burgess, Plaintiff, pro se.

Rebecca Feldman-Tracy, Stacy Hoem, Rubin Scott, Mink, Captain Esser, Lt. Scullion & Jolinda Waterman, Defendants, represented by Eliot Michael Held , Wisconsin Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General & Brandon Flugaur , Wisconsin Department of Justice.

ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Edward Burgess, an inmate at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility (WSPF), is proceeding on Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference and First Amendment retaliation claims against WSPF officials. On August 23, 2019, I granted part of defendants' motion for partial summary judgment based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases