ST. FLEUR v. CITY OF LINDEN

Civil Action No. 15-1464 (SRC).

PATRICK M. ST. FLEUR, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LINDEN, NEW JERSEY (a New Jersey Municipal Corporation); POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LINDEN; LAW DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LINDEN; NICHOLAS P. SCUTARI (in his official capacity as Chief Municipal Prosecutor); JAMES M. SCHULHAFER (in his official capacity as Chief of the City of Linden Police Department); OFFICER MARTIN JEDRZEJEWSKI; OFFICER GAVIN SHEEHAN; OFFICER JASON MOHR; LIEUTENANT ANDREW BARA; SERGEANT NANCY PETRUSKI; CHARLES CRANE and JOHN DOES 1-100 Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 30, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PATRICK M ST. FLEUR, Plaintiff, represented by HENRY FAIRCHILD FURST , JOSHUA MATTHEW LURIE , FURST + LURIE, RAYMOND M. BROWN , SCARINCI HOLLENBECK & ROBERT JAMES FLANAGAN, III , GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP.

CITY OF LINDEN, NEW JERSEY, a New Jersey Municipal Corporation, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LINDEN, LAW DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LINDEN & JAMES M SCHULHAFER, in his official capacity as Chief of the City of Linden Police Department, Defendants, represented by EDWARD J. KOLOGI , KOLOGI SIMITZ COUNSELLORS AT LAW & ROBERT F. VARADY , LA CORTE, BUNDY, VARADY & KINSELLA, ESQS.

NICHOLAS P SCUTARI, in his official capacity as Chief Municipal Prosecutor, Defendant, represented by EDWARD J. KOLOGI , KOLOGI SIMITZ COUNSELLORS AT LAW & MICHAEL A. D'ANTON, Sr. , CHASAN LEYNER & LAMPARELLO PC.

OFFICER MARTIN JEDRZEJEWSKI, Defendant, represented by CATHERINE M. DEAPPOLONIO , RENAUD DEAPPOLONIO LLC, EDWARD J. KOLOGI , KOLOGI SIMITZ COUNSELLORS AT LAW & ROBERT F. RENAUD , Renaud DeAppolonio LLC.

OFFICER GAVIN SHEEHAN, OFFICER JASON MOHR, LIEUTENANT ANDREW BARA, SERGEANT [FNU] PETRUSKI & CHARLES CRANE, Defendants, represented by EDWARD J. KOLOGI , KOLOGI SIMITZ COUNSELLORS AT LAW.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

OPINION

This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Patrick St. Fleur ("Plaintiff" or "St. Fleur") opposes the motion. The Court has reviewed the papers filed by the parties. It proceeds to rule on the motion without oral argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases