1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DAVIS v. SMITH
 

DAVIS v. SMITH

Civil Action No. 18-1956.

PRINCE DAVIS, Petitioner, pro se, v. BARRY SMITH, et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

August 27, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus: (General)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

PRINCE DAVIS, Petitioner, pro se.

BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA & THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents, represented by BANAFSHEH AMIRZADEH , PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE & MAX COOPER KAUFMAN , PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTY'S OFFICE.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of August 2019, upon consideration of the pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Prince Davis ("Petitioner") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, [ECF 1], the opposition thereto filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases