1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JACK v. GROSE
 

JACK v. GROSE

Case No. 2:16-cv-633.

JOHN JACK and TRI-STATE DISPOSAL, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. DEAN GROSE and SOUTH PARK VENTURES, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

August 28, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Allen Ray, Mediator, pro se.

Jeff Harper, K&H Partners, LLC & Central Environmental Services, LLC, Interested Partys, represented by Robert L. Bays , Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love.

DeepRock Disposal Solutions, LLC, Interested Party, represented by James Alan Coutinho , Allen Stovall Neuman Fisher & Ashton LLP, John Matthew Fisher , Allen Stovall Neuman Fisher & Ashton LLP & Rick L. Ashton , Allen Stovall Neuman Fisher & Ashton LLP.

John Jack, Plaintiff, represented by Clay Kenneth Keller , Jackson Kelly PLLC, Aaron E. McQueen , Jackson Kelly PLLC & Maria C. Klutinoty Edwards , Tzangas Plakas Mannos, Ltd.

Tri-State Disposal, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Molly K. Johnson & Aaron E. McQueen , Jackson Kelly PLLC.

Dean Grose & South Park Ventures, LLC, Defendants, represented by J. Michael Baggett , McCann, Garland, Ridall & Burke, pro hac vice & Mark A. Ropchock , Slater & Zurz.

Custom Blended Solutions, LLC, Movant, represented by Robert L. Bays , Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love.

South Park Ventures, LLC & Dean Grose, Counter Claimants, represented by J. Michael Baggett , McCann, Garland, Ridall & Burke & Mark A. Ropchock , Slater & Zurz.

John Jack, Counter Defendant, represented by Clay Kenneth Keller , Jackson Kelly PLLC, Aaron E. McQueen , Jackson Kelly PLLC & Maria C. Klutinoty Edwards , Tzangas Plakas Mannos, Ltd.

Tri-State Disposal, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Molly K. Johnson .

OPINION & ORDER

This matter is before the Court on South Park Ventures, LLC's ("SPV") and Dean Grose's ("Grose") Motion to Strike (ECF No. 214) John Jack's Reply (ECF No. 211) to the Response to the Motion in Limine. (ECF No. 205). This Court's Order Setting Trial Date...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases