INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Donald J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants.
Iranian Alliances Across Borders, University of Maryland College Park Chapter, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Donald J. Trump, et al., Defendants.
Eblal Zakzok, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Donald J. Trump, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Maryland.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Signed August 19, 2019.
Filed August 20, 2019.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Violation of Constitutional Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
David Robert Rocah, Deborah A. Jeon, Nicholas Taichi Steiner, Sonia Kumar, Cecillia D. Wang, Pro Hac Vice, Cody Wofsy, Pro Hac Vice, American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland Foundation, Baltimore, MD, Justin B. Cox, International Refugee Assistance Project, Atlanta, GA, Daniel Mach, Pro Hac Vice, David D. Cole, Pro Hac Vice, Heather Lynn Weaver, Pro Hac Vice, American Civil Liberties Union, Max Samuel Wolson, National Immigration Law Center, Washington, DC, David Hausman, Pro Hac Vice, Hina Shamsi, Pro Hac Vice, Hugh Handeyside, Pro Hac Vice, Lee Gelernt, Pro Hac Vice, Omar C. Jadwat, Pro Hac Vice, Sarah L. Mehta, Pro Hac Vice, Spencer E. Amdur, Pro Hac Vice, American Civil Liberties Union, Kathryn C. Meyer, Pro Hac Vice, Linda B. Evarts, Pro Hac Vice, Mariko Hirose, Pro Hac Vice, International Refugee Assistance Project, New York, NY, Esther Sung, Pro Hac Vice, Karen C. Tumlin, Pro Hac Vice, Nicholas Espiritu, Pro Hac Vice, National Immigration Law Center, Los Angeles, CA, Melissa S. Keaney, Pro Hac Vice, International Refugee Assistance Project, Fair Oaks, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Daniel Stephen Garrett Schwei, Michelle Bennett, United States Department of Justice, Hashim M. Mooppan, Washington, DC, for Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge.
On May 2, 2019, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants ("the Government") in these three cases. As relevant here, the Court denied the Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiffs' claims that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
