1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ARENDI S.A.R.L. v. HTC CORP.
 

ARENDI S.A.R.L. v. HTC CORP.

Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-1725-BJR.

ARENDI S.A.R.L., Plaintiff, v. HTC CORP., HTC AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

August 21, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arendi SARL, Plaintiff, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP, pro hac vice, John P. Lahad , SUSMAN GODFREY, pro hac vice, Max Isaac Straus , SUSMAN GODFREY LLP, pro hac vice, Neal C. Belgam , SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP, pro hac vice, Seth Ard , SUSMAN GODFREY LLP, pro hac vice, Stephen D. Susman , SUSMAN GODFREY, pro hac vice, Andres C. Healy , SUSMAN GODFREY & Kemper P. Diehl , SUSMAN GODFREY.

HTC Corporation, also known as High Tech Computer Corporation & HTC America Inc, Defendants, represented by Arthur G. Connolly, III , CONNOLLY GALLAGHER LLP, pro hac vice, Curt Holbreich , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice, Irene I. Yang , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice, Michael J. Bettinger , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice, Michael L. Roberts , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice, Ryan Patrick Newell , CONNOLLY GALLAGHER LLP, pro hac vice & Robin Wechkin , SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP.

HTC Corporation & HTC America Inc, Counter Claimants, represented by Arthur G. Connolly, III , CONNOLLY GALLAGHER LLP, pro hac vice, Curt Holbreich , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice, Irene I. Yang , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice, Michael J. Bettinger , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice, Michael L. Roberts , SIDLEY AUSTIN, pro hac vice & Ryan Patrick Newell , CONNOLLY GALLAGHER LLP, pro hac vice.

Arendi SARL, Counter Defendant, represented by Eve H. Ormerod , SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP, pro hac vice, John P. Lahad , SUSMAN GODFREY, pro hac vice, Max Isaac Straus , SUSMAN GODFREY LLP, pro hac vice, Neal C. Belgam , SMITH, KATZENSTEIN & JENKINS LLP, pro hac vice, Seth Ard , SUSMAN GODFREY LLP, pro hac vice, Stephen D. Susman , SUSMAN GODFREY, pro hac vice & Andres C. Healy , SUSMAN GODFREY.

PROCEDURES FOR TUTORIAL AND JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING

WHEREAS, on August 16, 2019, the parties jointly submitted to the Court pursuant to the Standing Order for Patent Cases (Dkt. 120), an email containing a proposal for the format of the tutorial and claim construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases