CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES v. CITY OF SEATTLE

No. 17-cv-00370-RSL.

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and RASIER, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SEATTLE; SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES; and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

August 7, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nature of Suit: 410 Anti - Trust
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Plaintiff, represented by Christian G. Vergonis , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Jacqueline M. Holmes , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Michael A. Carvin , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Robert Stander , JONES DAY, pro hac vice, Steven P. Lehotsky , U.S. CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER, pro hac vice & Timothy J. O'Connell , STOEL RIVES.

Rasier, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Robert J. Maguire , DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE & Douglas C. Ross , DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE.

City of Seattle, Defendant, represented by P. Casey Pitts , ALTSHULER BERZON LLP, pro hac vice, Stacey Leyton , ALTSHULER BERZON LLP, pro hac vice, Stephen P. Berzon , ALTSHULER BERZON LLP, pro hac vice, Brian G. Maxey , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Gregory Colin Narver , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE & Sara O'Connor-Kriss , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.

Seattle Department of Finance and Administrative Services & Calvin W Goings, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle, Defendants, represented by P. Casey Pitts , ALTSHULER BERZON LLP, pro hac vice, Stacey Leyton , ALTSHULER BERZON LLP, pro hac vice, Stephen P. Berzon , ALTSHULER BERZON LLP, pro hac vice, Gregory Colin Narver , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE & Sara O'Connor-Kriss , SEATTLE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.

Interested Party, Interested Party, represented by William L. Messenger , C/O NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION, pro hac vice.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO RENOTE HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONDING TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Motion to Renote Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Extend Discovery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases