DOE v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, DENVER

Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-03170-RM-STV.

JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, DENVER, COLORADO a/k/a Denver Public Schools ("DPS"); TOM BOASBERG, individually and in his official capacity as superintendent of DPS; ANDY MENDELSBERG, individually and in his official capacity as a principal with DPS; JANN PETERSON, individually and in her official capacity as an assistant principal with DPS; JEANETTE SCULLY, individually and in her official capacity as a dean with DPS; ERIC SINCLAIR, individually and in his official capacity as a dean with DPS; and ANITA CURTISS, individually and in her official capacity as a school psychologist with DPS; Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

July 30, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Cause: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Nature of Suit: 448 Civil Rights: Education
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane Doe, Plaintiff, represented by Igor Raykin , Kishinevsky & Raykin, LLC.

School District Number 1, Denver, Colorado, also known as Denver Public Schools "DPS", Tom Boasberg, in his official capacity as superintendent of DPS, Tom (I) Boasberg, individually, Jann Peterson, in her official capacity as an assistant principal with DPS, Jann (I) Peterson, individually, Jeanette Sculley, in her official capacity as a dean with DPS, Jeanette (I) Sculley, individually, Eric Sinclair, in his official capacity as a dean with DPS, Eric (I) Sinclair, individually, Anita Curtiss, in her official capacity as a school psychologist with DPS & Anita (I) Curtiss, individually, Defendants, represented by Brian Stuart Condon , Semple Farrington Everall & Case, P.C. & Holly Eileen Ortiz , Semple Farrington Everall & Case, P.C.

Andy Mendelsberg, in his official capacity as a principal with DPS & Andy (I) Mendelsberg, individually, Defendants, represented by Elliott Vallen Hood , Caplan & Earnest, LLC & Mary Gwyneth Whalen , Caplan & Earnest, LLC.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on two motions to dismiss: one by Defendant Mendelsberg (ECF No. 40) and another by the remaining Defendants (ECF No. 36). The motions have been fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 38, 39, 41, 42.) The Court has reviewed the pleadings, case file, and applicable law. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases