1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MATUSIEWICZ v. FLORENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
 

MATUSIEWICZ v. FLORENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE

Case Nos. 4:16-cv-01595-DCC, 4:16-cv-01596-DCC, 4:16-cv-01597-DCC, 4:16-cv-01598-DCC

Timothy Matusiewicz, Plaintiff, v. Florence County Sheriff's Office; William Kenney Boone; Mark E. Fuleihan; Anderson J. Beane; and Brooks A. Urquhart, in their respective individual capacities, Defendants. Tyler Matusiewicz, Plaintiff, v. Florence County Sheriff's Office; William Kenney Boone; Mark E. Fuleihan; Anderson J. Beane; and Brooks A. Urquhart, in their respective individual capacities, Defendants. Ronald Basile, Plaintiff, v. Florence County Sheriff's Office; William Kenney Boone; Mark E. Fuleihan; Anderson J. Beane; and Brooks A. Urquhart, in their respective individual capacities, Defendants. Diane Basile, Plaintiff, v. Florence County Sheriff's Office; William Kenney Boone; Mark E. Fuleihan; Anderson J. Beane; and Brooks A. Urquhart, in their respective individual capacities, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division.

July 29, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane Basile, Plaintiff, represented by David Ellis Roberts , Monoc Roberts LLC, Jacqueline LaPan Edgerton , McLeod Law Group LLC, Michael T. Cooper , McLeod Law Group LLC, W. Stephen Harris , Harris and Huge & W. Mullins McLeod, Jr. , McLeod Law Group LLC.

William Kenney Boone, in their respective individual capacities, Mark E Fuleihan, in their respective individual capacities, Anderson J Beane, in their respective individual capacities & Brooks A Urquhart, in their respective individual capacities, Defendants, represented by J. Scott Kozacki , Willcox Buyck and Williams.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.1 ECF No. 117.2 Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition. ECF Nos. 125, 128. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2), (D...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases