1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 398 F.Supp.3d
  5. 398 F.Supp.3d 494 (2019)
 

GREAT AMERICAN DUCK RACES v. KANGAROO MANUFACT'G

No. CV-17-00212-PHX-ROS.

398 F.Supp.3d 494 (2019)

GREAT AMERICAN DUCK RACES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. KANGAROO MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

Filed July 18, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Cause: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Nature of Suit: 820 Property Rights: Copyright
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph G. Adams, Peter Ryan Montecuollo, Taryn Jean Gallup, Snell & Wilmer LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs.

Julia M. Williams, Law Offices of Julia M. Williams, San Diego, CA, Edith I Rudder, Mark Kristopher Sahl, Timothy Regis Grimm, II, Carpenter Hazlewood Delgado & Bolen PLLC, Tempe, AZ, for Defendants.

ORDER

As established at trial, ducks in nature are often yellow and usually have wings, bills, and tails. But "[d]ucks do not naturally wear sunglasses in the wild." (Doc. 177 at 27). Both parties decided to try to improve on nature by manufacturing pool floats in the shape...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases