1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 390 F.Supp.3d
  5. 390 F.Supp.3d 72 (2019)
 

SCOTTSDALE CAPITAL v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY

Case No. 18-cv-2973 (CRC).

390 F.Supp.3d 72 (2019)

SCOTTSDALE CAPITAL ADVISORS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

Signed July 16, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian Lanciault, Pro Hac Vice, Maranda E. Fritz, Pro Hac Vice, Thompson Hine LLP, New York, NY, Joseph Andrew Smith, Thompson Hine LLP, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Terri L. Reicher, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jack Dempsey once observed that "the best defense is a good offense." In boxing, perhaps, but not always in litigation. This case proves the point.

For the past decade, Arizona-based securities brokerage Scottsdale Capital Advisors has...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases