1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PEREZ v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
 

PEREZ v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

Case No. 17-cv-00454-MMC.

MITZIE PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 12, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitzie Perez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Jahan C. Sagafi , Outten & Golden LLP, Adam T. Klein , Outten & Golden LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel Stromberg , Outten Golden LLP, pro hac vice, Joel Marrero , Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Michael N. Litrownik , Outten and Golden LLP, pro hac vice, Nantiya Ruan , Outten & Golden LLP, Ossai Miazad , Outten and Golden, Patrick David Lopez , Outten and Golden LLP, Rachel Williams Dempsey , Outten Golden LLP, Relic Sun , Outten and Golden LLP & Thomas Andrew Saenz , Mexican Amercian Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Andres Acosta, Victoria Rodas, Samuel Tabares Villafuerte, Sergio Barajas & Teresa Diaz Vedoy, Plaintiffs, represented by Patrick David Lopez , Outten and Golden LLP, Daniel Stromberg , Outten Golden LLP, pro hac vice, Joel Marrero , Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Nantiya Ruan , Outten & Golden LLP, Ossai Miazad , Outten and Golden, Rachel Williams Dempsey , Outten Golden LLP, Relic Sun , Outten and Golden LLP & Jahan C. Sagafi , Outten & Golden LLP.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Defendant, represented by Benjamin Jefferson Sitter , McGuireWoods LLP, Elizabeth Stork , Outten and Golden, LLP, pro hac vice, Elizabeth M. Thomas , McGuireWoods LLP, pro hac vice, Jamie Danielle Wells , McGuireWoods LLP, Jill Crawley Griset , McGuireWoods, LLP, pro hac vice, K. Issac DeVyver , McGuireWoods LLP, pro hac vice, Karla Lynn Johnson , McGuireWoods LLP, pro hac vice, Mary J. Hackett , McGuireWoods LLP, pro hac vice & Matthew David Monsour , McGuireWoods LLP.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL PORTIONS OF FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS

Re: Dkt. No. 261

Before the Court is plaintiffs' Administrative Motion, filed July 1, 2019, "to Seal Portions of Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Complaint."1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases