1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SCHUSTER v. ESPINOZA
 

SCHUSTER v. ESPINOZA

Case No. 1:12-cv-01482-AWI-SAB-HC.

LARISSA SCHUSTER, Petitioner, v. JANEL ESPINOZA, Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

July 10, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General)
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larissa Schuster, Plaintiff, represented by David M. Porter , Office of the Federal Defender.

Janel Espinoza, Defendant, represented by Justain Paul Riley , Attorney General's Office for the State of California Department of Justice.

ORDER VACATING JULY 11, 2019 HEARING

In light of counsel for Respondent's response addressing the failure to lodge a complete recording of Petitioner's pretrial interview, the Court shall vacate the hearing set for July 11, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

Due to the impact of habeas cases on the Court's docket...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases