LITTLE ROCK FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES v. RUTLEDGE

Case No. 4:19-cv-00449-KGB.

LITTLE ROCK FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LESLIE RUTLEDGE, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.

July 5, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Little Rock Family Planning Services, Plaintiff, represented by Bettina E. Brownstein , Betinna E. Brownstein Law Firm, Kelly M. Scavone , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Kendall Turner , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Leah Godesky , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Maithreyi Ratakonda , Planned Parenthood Federation of America, pro hac vice, Meagan M. Burrows , American Civil Liberties Union, pro hac vice, Rebecca R. Jackson , Attorney at Law, Susan Talcott Camp , American Civil Liberties Union, pro hac vice & Taylor Simeone , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice.

Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains & Stephanie Ho, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients, Plaintiffs, represented by Bettina E. Brownstein , Betinna E. Brownstein Law Firm, Kelly M. Scavone , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Kendall Turner , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Leah Godesky , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Maithreyi Ratakonda , Planned Parenthood Federation of America, pro hac vice & Taylor Simeone , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice.

Thomas Tvedten, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, Plaintiff, represented by Bettina E. Brownstein , Betinna E. Brownstein Law Firm, Kelly M. Scavone , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Kendall Turner , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Leah Godesky , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice, Maithreyi Ratakonda , Planned Parenthood Federation of America, pro hac vice, Meagan M. Burrows , American Civil Liberties Union, pro hac vice, Rebecca R. Jackson , Attorney at Law & Taylor Simeone , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, pro hac vice.

Leslie Rutledge, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas, Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Matt Durrett, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Washington County, Sylvia D Simon, M.D., in her official capacity as Chairman of Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, Jr, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Veryl D Hodges, D.O., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, John H Scribner, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Omar T Atiq, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Rhys L Branman, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Rodney Griffin, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Marie Holder, in her official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Brian T Hyatt, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Larry D Lovell, "Buddy" in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Timothy C Paden, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Don R Phillips, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, William L Rutledge, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, David L Staggs, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board & Nathaniel Smith, M.D., M.P.H., in his official capacity as Director and State Health Officer of the Arkansas Department of Health, Defendants, represented by Nicholas Jacob Bronni , Arkansas Attorney General's Office & Vincent Moore Wagner , Arkansas Attorney General's Office.


ORDER

Before the Court is defendants' expedited motion to reconsider ex parte consolidation order (Dkt. No. 22). Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition (Dkt. No. 28). By way of background, plaintiffs filed their complaint and motion for expedited consolidation or, in the alternative, to give...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases