ORTIZ v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY

No. 2:17-cv-0607 KJM DB PS.

RENE ORTIZ, Plaintiff, v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

June 28, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rene Ortiz, Plaintiff, pro se.

Enhanced Recovery Company, Kirk Moquin & Marty Sarim, Defendants, represented by Larissa G. Nefulda , Lewis Bribois Bisgaard & Smith LLP & Stephen H. Turner , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP.


ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 17, 2019, the undersigned took under submission several pending motions and vacated the hearing of those motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases