1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ANAND v. HEATH
 

ANAND v. HEATH

No. 19-CV-00016.

NARANTUYA ANAND, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JOHN C. HEATH, ATTORNEY AT LAW PLLC DBA LEXINGTON LAW FIRM; PROGREXION MARKETING INC.; FLUENT, INC.; AND REWARD ZONE USA, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

June 28, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Narantuya Anand, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Lance A. Raphael , TheConsumer Advocacy Center, P.C., Christopher Davis Kruger , Kruger & Gruber, LLP & Craig Rein Frisch , Consumer Advocacy Center.

John C Heath, Attorney at Law PLLC & Progrexion Marketing, Inc., Defendants, represented by Mary S. DiRago , Troutman Sanders LLP.

Fluent, Inc. & Reward Zone USA, LLC, Defendants, represented by George V. Desh , Mandell Menkes LLC, John David Fitzpatrick , Mandell Menkes LLC & Neil Eric Asnen , Klein Moynihan Turco LLP, pro hac vice.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Narantuya Anand brought a putative class action complaint alleging that she received unsolicited telemarketing calls to her cellular phone in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. Two of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases