VANN v. CITY OF ROCHESTER

No. 6:18-cv-06464(MAT).

DAVID VANN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, a municipal entity, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW DRAKE, IBM # 1956, POLICE OFFICER STEVEN MITCHELL, IBM # 2134, INVESTIGATOR JEFFREY KESTER, IBM # 2230, SERGEANT JEFFREY LAFAVE, II, IBM # 1634 POLICE OFFICER DAVID E. KEPHART, IBM # 2074, POLICE OFFICER ADAM BRODSKY, IBM # 2478, POLICE OFFICER TIMOTHY DEMPSEY, IBM # 2122, INVESTIGATOR CHRISTOPHER MUSCATO, IBM # 1331, CAPTAIN GARY MOXLEY, POLICE OFFICER ANGEL PAGAN, IBM # 2421, POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER J. BARBER, IBM # 1949, SERGEANT DANIEL J. ZIMMERMAN, IBM # 295, POLICE OFFICER ERIC MCGRAW, IBM # 2131, SERGEANT JOSEPH LAIOSA, IBM # 1180, INVESTIGATOR TOMESHA ANGELO, IBM # 1665, TECHNICIAN STEPHANIE MINTZ, IBM # 2496, Police Officers "JOHN DOES 1-10" (whose names are currently unknown), and other unidentified members of the Rochester Police Department, THE COUNTY OF MONROE, SANDRA DOORLEY, individually and as District Attorney of the County of Monroe, and MICHAEL HARRIGAN, as an employee of the Monroe County District Attorney's Office and individually, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

June 27, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Vann, Plaintiff, represented by Elliot Dolby Shields, Roth & Roth, LLP.

The City of Rochester, a municipal entity, Police Officer Matther Drake, Police Officer Steven Mitchell, Investigator Jeffrey Kester, Police Officer Christopher J. Barber, Police Officer David E. Kephart, Investigator Tomesha Angelo, Technician Stephanie Mintz, Sergeant Daniel J. Zimmerman, Sergeant Jeffrey Lafave, II, Police Officer Adam Brodsky, Police Officer Timothy Dempsey, Investigator Christopher Muscato, Captain Gary Moxley, Police Officer Angel Pagan, Police Officer Eric McGraw & Sergeant Joseph Laiosa, Defendants, represented by John M. Campolieto, Law Department.

The County of Monroe, Sandra Doorley, individually and as District Attorney of the County of Monroe & Michael Harrigan, as an employee of the Monroe County District Attorney's Office and individually, Defendants, represented by Matthew D. Brown, Monroe County Department of Law.


DECISION AND ORDER

I. Introduction

David Vann ("Vann" or "Plaintiff"), represented by counsel, instituted this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("§ 1983") alleging violations of his constitutional rights by the City of Rochester ("the City"), the County of Monroe ("the County"...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases