DOES v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

Case No. 1:13-cv-00275-BLW.

JOHN DOES I-XIX, and JOHN ELLIOTT, Plaintiffs, v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a congressionally chartered corporation authorized to do business in Idaho; CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a foreign corporation sole registered to do business in Idaho; and CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS AND SUCCESSORS, a foreign corporation registered to do business in Idaho, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Idaho.

June 11, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Doe XII, Plaintiff, represented by Ashley L. Vaughn , Dumas Law Group, pro hac vice, Gilion Claire Dumas & Andrew M. Chasan , CHASAN & WALTON.

Boy Scouts of America, a congressionally chartered corporation authorized to do business in Idaho, Defendant, represented by Mindy Marie Muller , Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP, Stephen R. Thomas , HAWLEY TROXELL ENNIS & HAWLEY LLP, Tyler J. Anderson , HAWLEY TROXELL ENNIS & HAWLEY LLP, Kasdin Miller Mitchell , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, pro hac vice & Michael W. McConnell , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, pro hac vice.

Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, a foreign corporation registered to do business in Idaho & Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors, a foreign corporation sole registered to do business in Idaho, Defendants, represented by Steven B. Andersen , Andersen Schwartzman Woodard Dempsey, PLLC, Wade L. Woodard , Andersen Schwartzman Woodard Dempsey, PLLC & Haley Krug , Andersen Schwartzman Woodard Dempsey, PLLC.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it a motion to exclude the testimony of John Rumel filed by the Church and joined by BSA. The motion is fully briefed and at issue. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the motion.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases