1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ACOSTA v. U.S.
 

ACOSTA v. U.S.

Nos. CV-17-00765-PHX-RCC, CR-05-01319-PHX-RCC-1

Andrew Acosta, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

June 10, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nature of Suit: 510 Prisoner: Vacate Sentence - Habeas Corpus
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Acosta, Petitioner, pro se.

USA, Respondent, represented by Charles Fred Hyder, US Attorneys Office & Karla Hotis Delord, US Attorneys Office.

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner Andrew Acosta's Motion Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ("§ 2255 Motion"). (Doc. 1.) Acosta claims that District Judge Mary H. Murguia erred when she designated him a "career offender" under United States Sentencing Guideline ("U.S.S.G.") §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases