1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CAPPS v. HARRIS
 

CAPPS v. HARRIS

Nos. 5:18-CV-133-FL, 7:18-CV-47-FL

TIMOTHY CAPPS, Plaintiff, v. MONTY HARRIS; NEWMARK SOUTHERN REGION, LLC; and DOES 1-25, Defendants, GREGORY KATZ, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. TIMOTHY CAPPS, Defendant and Counter-Claimant, and KACIE HOPKINS VAN HINE, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina.

June 6, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy Capps, Plaintiff, represented by John P. Barry , Proskauer Rose LLP, Leslie Lane Mize , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Pietro A. Deserio , Proskauer Rose LLP & Christopher J. Blake , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

Monty Harris, Defendant, represented by Mignon A. Lunsford , Burr & Forman LLP, Benjamin B. Coulter , Burr & Forman LLP & Victor L. Hayslip , Burr & Forman LLP.

Newmark Southern Region, LLC, Defendant, represented by David A. Paul , Cantor Fitzgerald, Jonathan D. Sasser , Ellis & Winters, LLP, Michael S. Popok , Cantor Fitzgerald, Miguel A. Lopez , Cantor Fitzgerald, Nirav S. Shah , Cantor Fitzgerald, Stephen M. Silva , Cantor Fitzgerald & Thomas Hamilton Segars , Ellis & Winters.

Gregory Katz, Counter Defendant, represented by Benjamin B. Coulter , Burr & Forman LLP.

Newmark Southern Region, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by David A. Paul , Cantor Fitzgerald, Jonathan D. Sasser , Ellis & Winters, LLP, Michael S. Popok , Cantor Fitzgerald, Miguel A. Lopez , Cantor Fitzgerald, Stephen M. Silva , Cantor Fitzgerald & Thomas Hamilton Segars , Ellis & Winters.

Timothy Capps, Counter Defendant, represented by John P. Barry , Proskauer Rose LLP, Leslie Lane Mize , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Pietro A. Deserio , Proskauer Rose LLP & Christopher J. Blake , Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendants' motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 2-4 ("FAA") (DE 66).2 Also before the court is defendant Katz's and Harris's motion to strike the declaration of Pietro Deserio...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases