1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 393 F.Supp.3d
  5. 393 F.Supp.3d 1086 (2019)
 

WILD WATERSHED v. HURLOCKER

No. 18 CV 486 JAP/SCY.

393 F.Supp.3d 1086 (2019)

WILD WATERSHED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sanford HURLOCKER, District Ranger, Santa Fe National Forest, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Mexico.

Signed June 3, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Cause: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Nature of Suit: 893 Environmental Matters
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen G. Durkovich, Law Office of Stephen Durkovich, Santa Fe, NM, Thomas John Woodbury, Forest Defense, PC, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiffs.

Andrew A. Smith, U.S. Department of Justice c/o U.S. Attorneys Office, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Wild Watershed, Multiple Chemical Sensitivities Task Force, Dr. Ann McCampbell, and Jan Boyer (collectively, Plaintiffs) have challenged the decisions of the United States Forest Service (USFS) approving two projects in the Santa Fe National Forest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases