1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CAPELLA PHOTONICS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS INC.
 

CAPELLA PHOTONICS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS INC.

Case No. 14-cv-03348-EMC.

CAPELLA PHOTONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 4, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Capella Photonics, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Robert D. Becker , Manatt Phelps and Philips, Susanna Lynn Chenette , White and Case & Christopher L. Wanger , Manatt Phelps & Phillips, LLP.

Cisco Systems Inc, Defendant, represented by Stephen R. Smith , Cooley LLP, John Frederick Gaustad , Baker Botts L.L.P., Matthew James Leary , Cooley LLP, pro hac vice, Sarah JoAnn Guske , Baker Botts LLP & Wayne O. Stacy , Baker Botts L.L.P., pro hac vice.

Ciena Corporation, Defendant, represented by Chi Cheung , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice, Clement Naples , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice, Elizabeth Verniers Johnson , Latham and Watkins LLP, James Bender , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice, Kyle A. Virgien , Latham & Watkins LLP, Matthew Moore , Latham and Watkins LLP, pro hac vice & Michelle Patricia Woodhouse , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc., Defendant, represented by Christopher E. Chalsen , Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy, pro hac vice, Nathaniel T. Browand , Milbank LLP, Pierucci Renee Katherine , Milbank Tweed Hadley McCloy & Suraj Balusu , Milbank, Tweed, Hadley, McCloy LLP, pro hac vice.

Tellabs Operations, Inc. & Coriant (USA) Inc., Defendants, represented by Colin T. Kemp , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Jonathan Pieter van Es , Banner and Witcoff, Ltd., pro hac vice, Thomas K. Pratt , Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Timothy James Rechtien , Banner and Witcoff, Ltd., Stephen Edward Berge , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Virgil Bryan Medlock, Jr. , Banner and Witcoff, Ltd., pro hac vice.

Ciena Corporation, Counter-claimant, represented by Chi Cheung , Latham and Watkins LLP, Clement Naples , Latham and Watkins LLP, Elizabeth Verniers Johnson , Latham and Watkins LLP, James Bender , Latham and Watkins LLP, Matthew Moore , Latham and Watkins LLP & Michelle Patricia Woodhouse , Latham and Watkins LLP.

Capella Photonics, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Robert D. Becker , Manatt Phelps and Philips & Susanna Lynn Chenette , White and Case.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Docket No. 205

The current matter has been stayed since 2015. Following Inter Partes Review ("IPR") proceedings and subsequent appeals, the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases