FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CONSUMER DEFENSE, LLC

Case No. 2:18-CV-00030-JCM-BNW.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CONSUMER DEFENSE, LLC, et. al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

May 17, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, represented by Gregory A. Ashe, Federal Trade Commission, Jason David Schall, Federal Trade Commission & Blaine T. Welsh, U.S. Attorney's Office.

Consumer Defense LLC, Nevada limited liabilty company & Consumer Link Inc, Nevada corporation, Defendants, represented by John David Lauritzen, Christensen & Jensen, P.C., pro hac vice & Karra Porter, Christensen & Jensen, pro hac vice.

Prefered Law, PLLC, Utah professional limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

American Home Loan Counselors, Utah limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

Consumer Defense Group, LLC, Utah limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

Consumer Defense, LLC, Utah limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

Brown Legal, Inc, Utah corporaton, Defendant, pro se.

AM Property Management, LLC, Utah limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

FMG Partners, LLC, Utah limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

Zinly, LLC, Utah limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

Jonathan P. Hanley, in his individual and corporate capacity, Defendant, pro se.

Sandra X Hanley, in her individual and corporate capacity, Defendant, pro se.

American Home Loans, LLC, Utah limited liability company, Defendant, pro se.

Phillip Francis Hanley, Interested Party, pro se.

Thomas W. McNamara, Receiver, represented by Abran E. Vigil, Ballard Spahr & Edward T. Chang, McNamara Smith LLP.


DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR ADDITONAL TIME TO REPLY

Defendant, Jonathan Hanley ("Hanley"), in respectfully asking that this court grant him 7 additional days to respond to Plaintiff FTC's Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Answers states as follows:

The nature and importance of this motion have required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases